Bespoke Cutter And Tailor

Apprentices => Drafting, Fitting and Construction => Topic started by: jruley on July 23, 2016, 12:24:08 PM

Title: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on July 23, 2016, 12:24:08 PM
Given the somewhat disappointing results of the close-fitting (originally torso line) shirt project:

http://movsd.com/BespokeCutter/index.php?topic=316.120

I have decided to continue by trying the "Classic Fit" draft shown in the same book (Patternmaking for Menswear by M & I Kim).

The book shows how to adjust a "close-fitting sloper" for "classic fit" by simple grading techniques.  I applied this to the existing sloper pattern pieces as follows:

Yoke:  No changes, except both ends extended 1/4".

Back:  Top of scye (at yoke seam) extended horizontally 1/4".  Bottom of scye lowered 1/4" vertically and extended horizontally 1/2".  Hem extended 1/2" horizontally.

Front:  Same as back.

I constructed a new toile body from these pieces which is shown below, worn over a T-shirt as it will be in practice.

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/f_zpst3jklsaw.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/b_zpsyiai1ifm.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/l_zpshnf0lwjc.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/r_zpsw8rdlcfr.jpg)

The new toile seems to follow my body shape just as the tighter one did, but is much freer and more comfortable.  One new issue is that the top of the button stand wants to stand away from my neck.  Does this mean I should cut the shoulders of the fronts straighter (effectively closing a dart in the neck hole) or is it just something that should be accepted in an easier fitting shirt?
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: posaune on July 23, 2016, 05:42:21 PM
No, For me it is not to accept. It means something is wrong. As you see you have little surplus over the shoulder (fabric stands away) . And maybe the front shoulder must be moved out front neck is too big or back neck to small.
First you have to clip into the right neck hole. See at side view how it hangs here. 1 cm deep clips -  start with 0.5 at CB. Left looks okay but clip anyway.
second: there is a flaw in your shoulder line. It dipps at the center (laying on the shoulder) and the end stands away. Open the shoulder at front. Pin it back 1 cm away from the back yoke seam neckhole (yes the neckline will not lay flush anymore). And repin it so that you get a straight shoulder line not this pagoda-style. It is best to let it do by some one. And adding at center shoulder will give a bit more length over the bust which will be welcomed.
now do it to the left - here the shoulder is worser.
lg
poaune
but you see, now you can wear a T-shirt under the shirt with the right ease
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: Henry Hall on July 24, 2016, 06:52:27 AM
If you compare the photos here with the photos of the previous project toile, you'll see that they are almost identical and thus the same remedies are likely to apply.

I would throw the M & I Kim book into the fire and start with a better draft.
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on July 24, 2016, 08:12:16 AM
Quote from: Henry Hall on July 24, 2016, 06:52:27 AM
If you compare the photos here with the photos of the previous project toile, you'll see that they are almost identical and thus the same remedies are likely to apply.

I would throw the M & I Kim book into the fire and start with a better draft.

With respect, I disagree.  I did not go back to the original draft, but applied the grade to the finished sloper pattern which already has been adjusted for scoliosis and a dropped shoulder.  So the M&I Kim draft, like any other, is merely a starting point.  A different starting point might need different adjustments, but the result would be just as dependent on the skill (or lack thereof) of the fitter.

And in any case, the book would not burn well in my wood stove, and can always be used as a doorstop :).

I offer a simple challenge to those who think the textbook is at fault here.  Select a convenient chest size (yours or otherwise) and draft the close-fitting and "classic fit" slopers.  Then take your favorite proportional shirt drafting system (Rundschau or otherwise) and do that draft using the same measurements.  It would be interesting to see how much they differ, and we might all learn something.

Reading posaune's comments, it occurred to me that the root cause might be too much curvature in the front yoke seams.  So here I have straightened them, which seems to have largely taken the "pagoda shape" out of the shoulder.  This still left the CF standing off  my neck in front, so I have pinned a couple of small darts in the front neck line.  These will not be sewn, but material will be taken out by folding the pattern (what I meant by straightening the shoulders).  This seems to be pulling the top of the button stand back into its desired place.

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/f_zpshkwpmmqz.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/b_zpsjbplriju.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/l_zpsbzu5ljjr.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/r_zpsqiqtum3x.jpg)

I see one remaining issue.  In the side views the chest and waist lines are not horizontal, but are higher in front than back.  This would indicate a balance issue, but the shirt fits well (I think) around the neck and scyes.  This slant will only be visible in fabrics that have a strong horizontal element, like plaids.  So, should I address it (possibly adding length above the chest line in front and reducing a corresponding length in back)?  Or is something more complicated required, like adding and removing wedges?

Or is it worth the trouble?
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on July 24, 2016, 12:17:06 PM
Here I have added a couple of test sleeves.  The right one is a new draft using the basic shirt sleeve in the textbook.  The left one is developed from the tight fitting shirt (peterle's sleeve head), with extra width added at the top of sleeve cap to make the seam length agree with the new scye.  As it worked out, both sleeves have almost equal cap height and bicep width.

I think the left one fits a little cleaner, but it is tight over the shoulder bone, as in the other shirt.  As a result I can only lift my arm a little way before feeling pressure.

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/f_zpsu1i2k0ch.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/fs_zps6eoyiq63.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/b_zps7fwkday8.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/bs_zpstasx58ry.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/l_zpsdqmdoa0e.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/r_zpsp74vdrdx.jpg)

Comments?
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: hutch-- on July 24, 2016, 05:46:04 PM
Jim,

I had a good look at you finished shirt and there was very little wrong with it. Just as casual suggestions, I would give you a bit more room around the shoulders so you had more movement, the second is probably a bit harder to do, What I know as sleeve cast. With the pattern pointing your arms almost straight downwards it will load the underarm when you lift your arms up high. What I am suggesting is to set the sleeve cast (the angle of the sleeves to the body) a bit higher angle. It will reduce the underarm load and allow more vertical movement with the arms.
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: posaune on July 24, 2016, 08:08:27 PM
Better, Jim. You have corrected the shoulderline (left shoulder should be a bit more taken in at armhole - bigger slope and therefor more length)  and narrowed the front neckhole (inserting here a bust dart  see:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aLUk0Xlee0).
(Sorry to say, I think this will increase the balance fault. In the fitting bodice you had this all the time)
Never the less I repeat clip your neckhole. Look at the side view (very good to see on the right side) - see how the seam is running over the ridge? it should be more fluent in my opion.
And I advise yo to check your armhole depth. You have a Tee underneath you need more length then and the sleeve should be draft a little wider.
A trick is to cut the sleeves with more "Hebelänge". This means to add at the sides seams 1 cm horizontal on both sides.
lg
posaune
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on July 24, 2016, 11:07:00 PM
Quote from: hutch-- on July 24, 2016, 05:46:04 PM

I would give you a bit more room around the shoulders so you had more movement, the second is probably a bit harder to do, What I know as sleeve cast. With the pattern pointing your arms almost straight downwards it will load the underarm when you lift your arms up high. What I am suggesting is to set the sleeve cast (the angle of the sleeves to the body) a bit higher angle. It will reduce the underarm load and allow more vertical movement with the arms.

Hutch,
I think I understand what you are suggesting.  To put it in terms used by the textbook, think of a shallow triangle with the long side horizontal (mountain top shape).  This horizontal base line is the bicep line, and is the circumference of the sleeve around the upper arm.  The vertical distance from this baseline to the top of sleeve is the cap height.  The slanted lines from this vertex to the ends of the bicep line (which become curves in the finished draft) are the front and back of scye lines.

To fit in the scye with no ease, there is a relationship between cap height and bicep width.  A higher sleeve cap will be tighter over the biceps and vice versa.
What you are calling a higher sleeve "cast" would be a lower cap height, which would increase width over the biceps.  This would not give more room around the shoulders per se, but would make the sleeve looser on the arm.

Of course in the new draft I can also lower the bottom of scye as posaune is suggesting.  This would increase the length of the scye, and I could get more bicep room without reducing the cap height.

The textbook recommends a cap height as a proportion of the bicep width (1/3 minus 1-1/8") which in effect sets a "cast angle" which is typical for shirts.  A higher cap (cast more vertical) will hang more cleanly but is tighter on the arm and restricts movement.  A lower cap (cast more horizontal) will be looser on the arm and freer, but will not hang as well with the arm at the side.

All quite a balancing act!
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on July 25, 2016, 07:28:43 AM
Here the body has new fronts with the following changes:

- Shoulder straightened to pull in the front neck

- 3/8" length added to front above chest line

- Lower front scye reshaped to scoop out a little less


(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/f1_zpsbgfdvoey.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/b1_zpsb2mqrn8d.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/l1_zpszewlycrv.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/r1_zpsi051wgad.jpg)


With the scye reshaped the test sleeves still fit:

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/f2_zpskfqe8kif.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/fs_zpssnxvtjjg.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/b2_zpsqwurvgfa.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/bs_zpsafyicql9.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/l2_zpstmotn4w5.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/r2_zpsitawdrzy.jpg)
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on July 25, 2016, 09:56:04 AM
Back to Hutch's point in post #5.

Here is a shirt made a couple of years ago.  The pattern started as McCall's 8409 "8 in one" men's shirt pattern, and has been progressively altered for a closer fit.  There is no correction for scoliosis or dropped shoulder.

The body pattern pieces are fairly similar to the ones under development.  The yoke is a little wider and comes further down the back.  The back has 2" extra width which is taken into pleats at the shoulder blades, which allows a straight cut body without dragging on the hips.  I think this also does a fairly good job of hiding the scoliosis.

The major difference is the sleeves.  This shirt has a much wider and lower sleeve cap than the one under development.  This (and probably the extra width in back) allow for complete freedom of movement around the shoulders.  The cost is the wrinkles and fluting you can see in the sleeves.

I might draft a sleeve like this for casual shirts, but I think I want something a bit more tailored looking for dress shirts.

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/f_zpsa4ghk9mz.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/fs_zpsesmt91oo.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/b_zpssanbdxgh.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/bs_zpsm0oth4ei.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/l_zpsaycyrmpl.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/r_zpshweir7vh.jpg)
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on July 26, 2016, 01:15:59 PM
I decided to go ahead and draft a sleeve with a lower cap.  The width of the bicep line was increased 1/2" each side, which lowered the cap about 3/4".  The resulting sleeve replaced the one in the left scye.

After trying it on I could go either way.  The sleeve is easier fitting around the shoulder, and allows more freedom to lift the arm.  It's a little messier looking but not horrible IMO.

Any suggestions?

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/f_zpsbidm8zub.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/fs_zpsmlilfgs5.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/b_zpsvl71qcko.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/bs_zpsgxapgr7s.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/l_zpsnrogh09p.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/r_zpsryrh5uze.jpg)
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: peterle on July 26, 2016, 07:48:20 PM
please stay stitch your neck hole. it seems to be stretched.

It´s a matter of taste wether you want your sleeve that wide or not. I´m sure  the old one isn´t too tight, I think the wideness just isn´t distributed right. the sleeves seem to have too much room at the front biceps and are tight at the back.

another issue is that your right shoulder bone and arm are shifted towards the back compared to the left. (compare the profile pics, concentrate on the distance  between sleeve edge and back edge). This caused the fold at the back in the older version and now causes the pulling fold at the right front armhole. To fix it you could  shift the  whole lower half of the right armhole line towards the center back for 1-1,5cm and smooth in the lines to the existing yoke points.
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on July 26, 2016, 10:46:32 PM
Quote from: peterle on July 26, 2016, 07:48:20 PM

another issue is that your right shoulder bone and arm are shifted towards the back compared to the left. (compare the profile pics, concentrate on the distance  between sleeve edge and back edge). This caused the fold at the back in the older version and now causes the pulling fold at the right front armhole. To fix it you could  shift the  whole lower half of the right armhole line towards the center back for 1-1,5cm and smooth in the lines to the existing yoke points.


That's interesting, but are you sure it's not an optical illusion?  I have no reference point when I turn sideways, so maybe I'm not standing square to the camera?  This is obvious in the last set, you can see more of my upper back from the left side than the right.

Looking at all the pictures in this thread, it seems to me that the tip of my right shoulder is actually further in front of the shoulder line (black line on yoke) than the tip of my left.  The right arm is more bent, so the elbow is further back.

The right side of the yoke is also slightly smaller than the left due to the alterations that were made for the dropped shoulder.
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: peterle on July 27, 2016, 04:49:31 AM
of course I can´t be sure, but all pics (including the other threads) seem to show this backwards shoulder. And the fabric behavior indicates it.

But try yourself: what happens to the fabric when you move your right shoulder forward a little bit? Do the folds dissappear? Will they increase?
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: posaune on July 27, 2016, 06:29:13 AM
I second you Peterle. Jim's scoliose is not only 2 dimensional it is 3. A difficult to fit twisted posture (I do not want to repeat it again - but look at the neck hole).
And I second the distribution of width in the sleeve. Maybe a little rotation would be welcomed.
lg
posaune
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on July 27, 2016, 12:19:02 PM
Quote from: peterle on July 27, 2016, 04:49:31 AM

But try yourself: what happens to the fabric when you move your right shoulder forward a little bit? Do the folds dissappear? Will they increase?

This pulling fold has always mystified me.  It's there in the photos, but it never appears in the mirror when I try on the shirt (and yes I know the image is reversed).  I can't seem to make it appear by moving my shoulders.  It must be something to do with how I stand for the camera.

Quote from: posaune on July 27, 2016, 06:29:13 AM
(I do not want to repeat it again - but look at the neck hole).

lg
posaune


The reason I haven't clipped the neck hole is there is only 1/4" of seam allowance there in this draft.  With the tight collar suitable for wearing a necktie, the neckhole is going to have to ride over the collarbone, I can't make it bigger.

Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: peterle on July 27, 2016, 09:00:41 PM
Well yes. tailors know this phenomenon as "mirror posture". That´s the reason why the customer must not face a mirror when fitting.
Probably the pics are more trustworthy.

Try to rotate the whole shoulder area, moving the right shoulder forward a little and the left backwards.
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on July 29, 2016, 01:58:41 AM
Things were looking good enough (I thought) to make another finished shirt.  Same kind of material (poly/cotton broadcloth) as last time.

I made the following changes:

- Took in the sides at waist line 1" on each side (total of 4" suppression)

- Added blade pleats (1" additional width each side of yoke seam)

- Used the sleeve draft with recommended crown height from the textbook

The result fits comfortably and does a good job hiding the scoliosis and dropped shoulder.   Some diagonal folds appear in the chest when it is tucked in, but I think some messiness is to be expected with nothing to hold the tail down.

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/f_zpsivtw8srg.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/fs_zpsdea6t2fm.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/b_zps8qlr92nb.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/bs_zpsgff1bkol.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/l_zpsdndxrhjw.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/r_zps9g5vdlvy.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/ft_zpsjfgmcrpw.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/bt_zpsl6cnapsl.jpg)
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: Henry Hall on July 29, 2016, 02:34:06 AM
It actually does hide the imbalances!
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: peterle on July 29, 2016, 06:58:43 PM
You could try this:


(http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab204/rosenquarz7at/79b914b78f9ec01568d14f51b961c2cb_zps9gv5rqwn.jpg)
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: Greger on July 30, 2016, 08:55:35 AM
Some tailors say the sides of the shirt are cut to long. The front and back are to be cut long, but not the sides. The sides are just long enough to stay tucked in, and comfortable.
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: Schneiderfrei on July 30, 2016, 05:58:40 PM
And BTW no folds from the back Right Shoulder on the latest photos :)
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on July 30, 2016, 11:41:21 PM
Quote from: Schneiderfrei on July 30, 2016, 05:58:40 PM
And BTW no folds from the back Right Shoulder on the latest photos :)

Did I really fix it?  Or do the blade pleats hide it :)?

If peterle's latest theory is correct, I need to move the right shoulder backwards.  So the issue is still there, it's just not manifested because of the ease in this style of shirt.

Which is OK for now.  If I start playing with the shoulders, I'll probably need different right and left sleeve patterns. 
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: Schneiderfrei on July 31, 2016, 11:32:47 AM
Certsinly the ease helps, but I thought that the folds even point the other way in some of the shots.  Maybe it is another factor?
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on August 04, 2016, 10:06:32 AM
This is some fun with leftovers.  I didn't have enough of either color left to make a complete shirt, so I made a two-tone one.

Differences from the previous version:

- Straight cut sides and tail
- Convertible style collar
- Lower crowned sleeve (see post #10)
- Pocket on left breast

Comments/suggestions will be appreciated.

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/f_zpsff2irfqp.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/fs_zpsh7yx8g0v.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/b_zpshhfvh0jn.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/bs_zpsxj9thotq.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/l_zpsuw0i72wt.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/r_zps9vrv1zei.jpg)
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: Schneiderfrei on August 04, 2016, 01:18:47 PM
I like the two tone effect.  Its fun.
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: Greger on August 04, 2016, 01:31:22 PM
Yes! A nice way to use left overs.
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on August 11, 2016, 11:40:33 AM
Here are a couple more shirts for (I hope) your viewing pleasure.

The first is a short sleeve in a cotton seersucker material.  I think the fold on the right front chest comes from not having an assistant and running back and forth to the camera:

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/f_zpslukgktlz.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/fs_zpsuaskyszm.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/b_zpsonr0yndu.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/bs_zpszjspvjaf.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/l_zpsxjchm77y.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/r_zpssyahzh7o.jpg)
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on August 11, 2016, 11:48:20 AM
The next shirt is a tan and blue plaid madras cotton.  I cut the yoke on the bias in hopes it would make the asymmetry a little less obvious.

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/f_zpstgjvyx7w.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/fs_zpsgccikycs.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/b_zpshtr2v1qq.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/bs_zpsp9lclpvy.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/l_zps8k24fy8r.jpg)

(http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w315/ruleyjm/Classic%20Fit%20Shirt/r_zpsy8ibgysy.jpg)
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: theresa in tucson on August 13, 2016, 01:31:27 AM
J, your shirts look comfortable and you should get lots of wear out of them.  Now that you have a successful pattern you can vary it and make multiples.

Theresa in Tucson
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: Henry Hall on August 13, 2016, 01:58:21 AM
Very nice. The new lighting setup/backdrop sets everything off. It rather brings it more alive when you see shirts in various cloths other than just plain colours or unbleached cotton.
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on August 13, 2016, 04:38:40 AM
Quote from: theresa in tucson on August 13, 2016, 01:31:27 AM
J, your shirts look comfortable and you should get lots of wear out of them.  Now that you have a successful pattern you can vary it and make multiples.

Theresa in Tucson

Thanks for the compliment.  One thing bothers me - I wonder if the folds in the right chest (which are consistent across several different fabrics) are due to an overcorrection for scoliosis?  We developed that correction before dropping the right shoulder, and I wonder if there is a little too much slant in the side seams?

Should be easy to check - I can cut the next short-sleeve shirt with some inlay at the sides and play around with the slant...
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: posaune on August 13, 2016, 04:50:19 AM
As your bone is more in front on the right side  you need more length here in bodice and maybe sleeve. Less slant is to achieve
posaune
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: jruley on August 13, 2016, 07:10:50 AM
Quote from: posaune on August 13, 2016, 04:50:19 AM
Less slant is to achieve


I'm sorry, I don't understand - do you mean less slant is needed, or more?
Title: Re: Developing the "Classic Fit" Shirt
Post by: posaune on August 13, 2016, 05:26:34 PM
less, you not more length over the bone.
sorry for my english
posaune